Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 28.06.2025 08:52

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

How do I beat domestic battery charges against my covert narcissist husband who is lying and playing the victim?

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Why do people who were very kind and loving once become cold-hearted?

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Fastest Payout Online Casinos 2025: Black Lotus Expands Customer Payment Options - GlobeNewswire

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Let’s just make it real clear:

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Cat Parasite Can Seriously Disrupt Brain Function, Study Suggests - ScienceAlert

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

How to watch Apple’s WWDC keynote with iOS 26 and more - 9to5Mac

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Trumpworld Is Fighting Over ‘Official’ Crypto Wallet - WIRED

What’s next?

Just in the last 5 years:

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

What are the core beliefs of liberalism and conservatism? Can you provide a list of defining characteristics for each side?

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

When reading can – and can't – help with mental health - BBC

Thank you.

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Russia can stop this any time.

How could NASA possibly land on the moon when it's impossible to reach the moon through the Earth's dome? Why are they making up such an obvious lie?